Umami
Umami — analytics and business intelligence platform.
Stack Components
Why
Data-driven product decisions through event tracking, funnels, and dashboards. PostHog and Plausible offer privacy-first analytics without GDPR consent banners, growing 200% in 2024.
BigQuery and ClickHouse process petabyte-scale data at $5/TB scanned.
When
Use for product analytics, user behavior, and BI reporting. Avoid for simple page-view counting (use Plausible).
How
Example
Common Problems
- ⚠Umami event volume explosion — sample high-cardinality events
- ⚠GDPR consent not enforced — gate tracking behind consent banner
- ⚠Configuration drift between environments — use infrastructure-as-code (Terraform/Pulumi) to keep dev/staging/prod identical
Best Practices
- ✓Define a consistent event taxonomy before implementing Umami
- ✓Use server-side tracking for accuracy and ad-blocking resilience
- ✓Set up health checks and graceful shutdown — handle SIGTERM to drain in-flight requests before exit
FAQ
What is Umami and what projects is it for?
Umami — analytics and business intelligence platform. It pairs layered technologies for end-to-end type safety and out-of-the-box deploys, fitting everything from MVPs to production SaaS.
How do I spin up a working demo with Umami in 10 minutes?
Two steps: (1) Create Umami account/project; (2) Add tracking SDK. Get the local dev server running, then wire one real data source to verify the end-to-end loop.
What is the most common pitfall with Umami and how do I avoid it?
The most common pitfall is: Umami event volume explosion — sample high-cardinality events. Avoid it by adding the matching checklist to your PR template and running type-check + lint + unit tests in CI — three gates before merge.
What are the best practices for Umami?
Best practices for Umami include: Define a consistent event taxonomy before implementing Umami; Use server-side tracking for accuracy and ad-blocking resilience; Set up health checks and graceful shutdown — handle SIGTERM to drain in-flight requests before exit. The first one — "Define a consistent event taxonomy before implementing Umami" — should be set up at project init to avoid costly rework later.
When should I NOT choose Umami?
Pick something else in three cases: (1) the team has zero experience with the core framework and the deadline is tight (learning-curve risk); (2) it's a pure content/marketing site (Astro is lighter); (3) you need very high throughput (>10k RPS) or strict-consistency microservices (Go/Rust). Umami shines for mid-to-high complexity full-stack and API work — don't over-engineer simple static pages with it.